Skip to Main Content
2011-11-16 06:31 am (UTC)
I found her responses to the candidate questions often dismissive and/or missing the point entirely ("there isn't an unusual amount of volunteer burnout!" & all subsequent answers to questions about burnout and volunteer retention), and extremely limited in terms of the true scope and potential of the organisation (eg dismissing the devmem committee as only being around to get money to support AO3 servers. seriously.
(The language she used in her responses I also found very flippant, and was disappointed with her last minute no-shows to candidate chats, and late responses to questions with deadlines asked outside of chats.)
Compared to the other candidates who actually clearly engage with the level of dismay and disillusionment so many members, volunteers and staffers feel (I feel like it's pretty clear that that's the place a lot of questions come from, even if so much of fandom wasn't abuzz with it at the moment), and address them by identifying current problems with the organisation and clearly stated that they're dedicated to working on fixing them.
Reply to this
Thread from start
Post a comment in response:
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
You can comment on this post while signed in with an account from many other sites, once you have confirmed your email address.
Sign in using OpenID
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Check spelling during preview
This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.
Log in with OpenID?
Forget your password?
Site and Journal Search
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
Site and Account