hope: Art of a woman writing from tour poster (THE VOLUME OF MY VOICE)
puddingsmith ([personal profile] hope) wrote2007-07-21 08:16 pm
Entry tags:

FINISHED.

*collapse*


ETA: just in case, avoid comments for spoilers.

ETA2: DEFINITELY avoid comments for spoilers.

ETA3:

- I loved all the double entendres.

- I loved Molly Weasley's Ripley moment (A LOT)

- NEVILLE. NEVILLE! ILU, NEVILLE!

- One can't help but think that the epilogue existed at least partially to thwart the 'ginny is a slut' people/harmonians.

- Started weeping when Harry found out the doe was Snape's patronus. Was weeping so much when Harry was walking to his 'death' that I could barely see the page.

- Was utterly confused by the "who's wand is it anyway?" speech. Huh? I do not get it. (And if *I* don't get it... isn't this supposed to be a kid's book?)

- The epilogue reminded me so much of [livejournal.com profile] gekizetsu's Salvation 'verse. SO MUCH I CAN'T EVEN.

[identity profile] daniel-bethany.livejournal.com 2007-07-23 06:12 am (UTC)(link)
i think the wand thing worked like this:

it was dumbledore's wand, until draco won it off him in the tower at the end of book 6, so it became his (even though snape killed him, it was draco that got the wand off him). harry defeated draco, so then it was his (even though draco never had that wand).

or something.

i'm really not sure about that whole "19 years later" bit. it felt like really bad fan fiction.