hope: Art of a woman writing from tour poster (Default)
puddingsmith ([personal profile] hope) wrote2004-01-12 08:07 pm

PSA

I've found lately that I'm more and more tending to keeping my photos in their original large dimensions, rather than resizing them to making them more viewer-friendly (especially to those with dial-up).

So, those of you reading this: I will be in future posting larger pictures (no more than 640 pixels at its largest dimension, each around 200kb). would you like me to lj-cut them or no?

comment and let me know.

[identity profile] stimpson.livejournal.com 2004-01-12 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
The KB size of the photos isn't a problem for me, as i'm lookin' on broadband. But cutting things that might make my friends page go wonky would be good. Because i'm too frickin' lazy to scroll, yo.

[identity profile] stimpson.livejournal.com 2004-01-12 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
No, it shouldn't be too wide if i'm viewing everything at my normal screen resolution.

[identity profile] linaelyn.livejournal.com 2004-01-12 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
::my icon lusts after your icon:::

[identity profile] stimpson.livejournal.com 2004-01-12 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
*my icon offers your icon a sniff of mescaline*

[identity profile] stimpson.livejournal.com 2004-01-12 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
*my icons say they wouldn't put it past your icons to do something like that*
ext_4120: (Default)

[identity profile] verylisa.livejournal.com 2004-01-12 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
I'd rather that they're not cut, just to save my selfish self a click, but I'm not fussed.

[identity profile] dammitcarl.livejournal.com 2004-01-12 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
i like 'em uncut.

[identity profile] linaelyn.livejournal.com 2004-01-12 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
Speed for dl is not the problem for me. It's when the stoopid page has to scroll sideways!!!!

>.<

However, I seem to recall this being a peeve of yours as well, so I'll trust you not to...try not to do anything...stupid.

640 seems like a reasonable size.
nothing_to_say: (Default)

[personal profile] nothing_to_say 2004-01-12 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
As many before me speaks, the loading time isn't much of a issue. Though I do really appericate that you can try to shrink the pictures a bit so my flist page won't go all wide and wonky on me. =)
ext_14277: (Default)

[identity profile] eyebrowofdoom.livejournal.com 2004-01-12 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
I would tend to say, please cut them, but I seem to be in the minority.

When I complain, you can whoop my ass, and then we'll both be happy.

[identity profile] tangelian.livejournal.com 2004-01-12 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
I would prefer if you LJ cut them, since my screen on this laptop is quite small... and even considerable small pics tend to mess up my friends page. But if I'm a minority, I will accept it. ;-)

/Tangelian

[identity profile] thisside.livejournal.com 2004-01-12 05:21 am (UTC)(link)
I prefer cut so they don't screw up the scrolling of my friends page.

[identity profile] doroa.livejournal.com 2004-01-12 05:50 am (UTC)(link)

Size is not a problem either for download or for display, but I'd rather see them cut than downsized.

Also, since I check my flist several times a day, I tend to fret about using too much of your bandwidth when the pics are not lj-cut.

I thoroughly enjoy your vision and your skill with the tweaking. Thank you :)

*hugs*

[identity profile] cheeriomonkey.livejournal.com 2004-01-12 10:36 am (UTC)(link)
I'd appreciate a cut, actually. I heart your photos.

[identity profile] arien.livejournal.com 2004-01-12 12:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't need a cut, but I'm on broadband.