August 15th, 2004

Aug. 15th, 2004

  • 1:41 AM
hope: Art of a woman writing from tour poster (straight? you've got to be kidding.)
glahhh we just watched 3 episodes of twin peaks in a row. i finished a scarf, and started and almost finished another. i stayed up til 2am last night writing my zine editorial and now it's almost 2am again.  tomorrow i vill put ze zine togetha.

mua ah ah ah

ee!

Aug. 15th, 2004

  • 11:38 AM
hope: Art of a woman writing from tour poster (the money shot.)
okay, so i'm putting together the zine and have come up against a stumbling block. authors have rated their own stories, but it's not exactly consistent.

usually my process is:
no sex = G or PG, depending on themes
cussing, kissing, some romantic involvement = PG-13
blowjob, hand job, vague description of penetrative sex = R
explicitly described penetrative sex = NC-17

though there are cases in the zine where there's like, explicitly described blow jobs that would rate at NC-17.  then there are other blow jobs that aren't as explicit, and i would rate as R.  but should I make that definition in language, or in plot?

to appease my curiosity:

[Poll #336016]

edit: [livejournal.com profile] lorie945 suggested that if i have an overall warning and disclaimer (which i do), i shouldn't be putting ratings on individual stories. what do you reckon?