hope | (no subject)

got another roll of film developed today, this was the roll that fucked up in the camera and didn't wind on properly, so i got the tech at the photo lab to pull it out so i could try using it again. flicking through the photos, i found one at the start where i was liek "omg wtf??" and couldn't work out what the hell it was until i realised it was the manifestation of the fuck-up in the film last time - essentially, 34 photos all exposed onto the same frame of film.

levels adjusted a bit so it's a bit clearer. cool, huh? next roll of film i think i'll double expose all of them. whee!

just read this story ~~(i'm GAY for YOU, spider-man!)~~, which was good, but weird too, because new fandom eep! i'm not so much a slash fan as a fan who likes slash, because seriously considering slash in another fandom, or with a pairing outside my usual focus, kinda squicks me. i'd like to get involved in more fandoms, though. maybe i'll give spidey a go.

hardly had any sleep this weekend. exhausted. bleh to another work week.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

do you have any recommendations for the type of things to shoot with double exposure?

One of my favourite things to do was to mess with proportion.. so, say take a shot of a garden tap that will fill the frame. Then take a photo of a person standing somewhere that fills maybe a quarter to a third of the frame. The results can be pretty nifty. Mixing stuff to get things like a tree growing out of a building can be tricky, but also look neat.

I used to like going with the more strange surreal stuff than arty, so I can only give bonkers suggestions like that :)

I wish that there was a function on digital cameras to make a double exposure. I suppose you could achieve the effect to some degree in photoshop or GIMP, but it's just not the same.